Moral thinking
Human evolution
Moral thinking
Feb 21st 2008 | BOSTON
From The Economist print edition
Human evolution
Feb 21st 2008 | BOSTON
From The Economist print edition
It seems empathy is not a good thing when it comes to negotiations…
May 1st 2008
From The Economist print edition
It pays to get inside your opponents’ heads rather than their hearts
Read more »
…well, actually, it’s the testosterone… from BBC News, and below it, TIME Magazine’s take on it:
Hormone surges among City traders could be partly responsible for driving “boom and bust” economics, say researchers. Read more »
Article from Nature:
Dictatorial behaviour may be partly genetic, study suggests.
Read more »
It is supposed to improve your productivity:
Time magazine article on love and evolution. The part on pheromones may be inaccurate as it mentions women synchronizing their menstrual cylces, and I am pretty sure I’ve read a recent study debunking that. But it seems to be up to date on the MHC detection issue, with the surprising conclusion that our high divorce rate may be affected by women selecting their mates while on birth control pills and realizing their choice is wrong after they get off it (nomally women prefer men with opposite MHC to their own; but while pregnant or on the pill, they prefer like MHC).
And most importantly, the wise advice: do not pick your mate with elevated levels of adrenalin — that seems to make them more appealing than they really are.
Here is the story:
A robot that makes decisions based on “emotions” in order to save computation time — hmm, sounds like humans! Reference to the OCC psychological model (198
that was used to define the emotions in terms of objects, actions and events.
Although it started out as a means of practising expressing myself, this blog is turning out to be more of a compendium of interesting information I come across. One of these days I’ll have to actually write something as opposed to cut and paste. ![]()