Pragma Synesi – interesting bits

Compendium of interesting bits I come across, with an occasional IMHO

Market boom/bust cycles are men’s fault

…well, actually, it’s the testosterone… from BBC News, and below it, TIME Magazine’s take on it:

Hormones ‘may fuel market crises’

Hormone surges among City traders could be partly responsible for driving “boom and bust” economics, say researchers.

A Cambridge University team found testosterone levels were directly linked to the profit they made.

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences study also found levels of the stress hormone cortisol could affect the risks they took.

A psychologist who works with investment bankers said it may help explain seemingly irrational behaviour.

At times like these economics has to consider the physiology of investors, not just their rationality
Dr John Coates
Cambridge University

The Cambridge study measured testosterone levels in a small group of male City of London traders at both 11am and 4pm, and matched these to the levels of profit or loss recorded for that day.

They found that daily testosterone levels were significantly higher on days when traders made more than their average profit.

They ascribe this to the “winner effect”, seen in sportsmen, in which success increases testosterone levels, which in turn increase feelings of confidence and ability to take risks, which then increase the chances of further profits.

However, if repeated too much, they say, the rising testosterone levels could eventually compromise their ability to make rational decisions, as the traders take bigger and bigger risks during so-called “bubbles”, where the market rises sharply.

Prof Joe Herbert, one of the study’s authors, said: “Our work suggests that these decisions may be biased by emotional and hormonal factors that have not so far been considered in any detail.

“Hormones may be important for determining how well an individual trader performs in the stressful and competitive world of the market.”

‘Learned helplessness

The researchers also looked at cortisol, which is produced in response to stress, and in the case of traders, extreme volatility in the markets.

In very stressful situations, some traders will just freeze
Jeremy Holt
Occupational Psychologist

Dr John Coates, another of the study’s authors, said that while ever-increasing testosterone levels might turn risk-taking into an “addiction”, the reverse was true with the stress hormone cortisol, which, in excess, causes people to actively avoid risk, potentially worsening the effects of any downturn.

“In the present credit crisis, traders may feel the noxious effects of chronic cortisol exposure, and end up in a psychological state known as ‘learned helplessness’.

“If this happens central banks may lower interest rates only to find that traders still refuse to buy risky assets.

“At times like these, economics has to consider the physiology of investors, not just their rationality.”

‘In the Zone’

Jeremy Holt, an occupational psychologist who works with investment banks to coach their traders on the psychology of risk-taking, agreed that both scenarios fitted well with his experiences.

“Traders will often talk to me about being ‘in the zone’ – similar to a sportsman, meaning a feeling of ‘unconscious competence’, decisiveness and confidence.

“But it’s amazing the number of times that traders put in a really good run but then hand a lot of their profits back because they have become over-confident, and didn’t just stop when they needed to.

“They often come up with some strange, irrational reasons for doing this.”

He added: “On the other hand, in very stressful situations, some traders will just freeze, and not do anything.”

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/7342923.stm

Published: 2008/04/14 21:39:23 GMT

© BBC MMVIII

==========================================================

TIME Magazine’s take on the same study focuses on testosterone being “good for business”:

Monday, Apr. 14, 2008

High Testosterone Means High Profits

By Adam Smith/London

You can almost hear Gordon Gekko cheer. Financial traders are widely seen as filthy rich, brash, and, well, ballsy. Now it turns out that there’s cash in those cojones. According to new research from the University of Cambridge, a male trader’s daily testosterone level is higher on days when he makes more than he would in an average day. What’s more, the higher a trader’s morning testosterone level, the more money he’ll likely have netted before the close of business that day. Testosterone, in other words, can be good for business.

In the study, published Monday in the latest issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a U.S. scientific journal, 17 London traders, aged 18 to 38, donated saliva samples over an eight-day period. Each time they did — once at 11 am, and again at 4 pm, book-ending the bulk of each day’s transactions — the traders, dealing mostly in futures, recorded their current profit-and-loss standing. (They were also quizzed to make sure that nothing they’d eaten or talked about outside of their work was acting on their hormone levels.)

Taking the average of just two daily samples makes it tricky to untangle the impact that a higher than average testosterone level has on that day’s profit and loss — or vice versa. More telling, though, is the correlation between a higher morning testosterone level and the pumped-up profits recorded later the same day. Traders scored elevated testosterone on different days, scratching out any chance that blanket market changes were at work on the entire group’s profits (and hormones). The traders’ levels of cortisol, meanwhile, a hormone affecting their response to challenge or stress that was measured using the same samples, was shown to move in tandem with the level of volatility in the markets.

Testosterone levels are known to rise during competitive encounters as much as they do during sexual ones, so it’s hardly surprising that the hormone responds to the trials of financial markets. More remarkable, perhaps, is that no one had previously worked out how, especially considering the known risks — sensation-seeking and impulsivity among them — associated with persistently high levels of the hormone. The increased levels measured in Cambridge’s brief study might have been acute, as opposed to chronic. And the research was carried out during a relatively calm period in the markets. But consider what scientists call the “winner effect”: two athletes preparing to compete against one another will both experience rising testosterone levels. After the race, though, only those of the eventual winner would continue to climb; the loser’s falls. The winner thus gets a persistent boost in confidence and appetite for risk, which increases the same competitor’s chance of winning again.

But only up to a point. The effects triggered by chronically elevated levels of testosterone can eventually have the opposite effect. Animals observed in this same situation by scientists start to pick fights they ought to avoid, or to patrol a wider, more hazardous patch of territory. Perception of risk becomes blurred. For a trader on a roll in the midst of a bubble, for instance, that suggests “several rounds of winning means testosterone so high they start taking stupid risks,” says John Coates, a former Wall Street trader turned senior research fellow at Cambridge, and lead author of the study. Amid today’s volatile markets, chronically high levels of cortisol, which can conjure up feelings of anxiety and negative thoughts, are believed likely to squeeze a trader’s stomach for risk, potentially perpetuating a market’s fall still further.

For the banks, there’s little they can do to hedge against the rise and fall of hormones. (Asking after a recruit’s age can be a delicate task, let alone his testosterone level.) A handful of major investment banks contacted by TIME all declined to comment on the study. As for the traders, the research is by no means an encouragement to abuse steroids. They’re “the most dangerous chemical you can put in your body,” says Coates. Doing so would mean “changing your body, your brain, the memories you recall, growth, your mood,” he adds. “And they’re weird.” Gordon Gekko might simply say they’re for wimps.

Find this article at:http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1730662,00.html

Advertisements

April 15, 2008 - Posted by | behaviour, decision making, economics, emotions | , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: